AT&T

Colin Kaepernick Rumors: Giants, Redskins, Among Teams Attending Workout

Former San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick will hold a free-agent workout Saturday after the NFL sent a memo to all 32 teams with an invitation to send representatives, and the number of teams expected to attend is beginning to rise...

This 36-Year-Old Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Model Is Embracing Her Body With Nude Selfie

This hot mama is taking the power back!

'Serial rapist' facing 37 charges 'told officer': 'If you had caught me for the first two, the rest of this wouldn’t have happened'

A serial rapist accused of assaulting several women and children during a rampage across the country told police he could have been caught earlier, a court has heard.

Fox’s Chris Wallace: Bill Taylor Was ‘Very Impressive’ and ‘Very Damaging’ to Trump

During the first recess in Wednesday’s public impeachment hearing, Fox News anchor Chris Wallace noted that top Ukraine diplomat Bill Taylor was a “very impressive witness” and that his testimony was “very damaging” to President Donald Trump.In his lengthy opening statement on Wednesday, Taylor revealed for the first time that Trump’s interest in Ukraine investigating former Vice President Joe Biden and his son went even further than originally known. According to Taylor, U.S. Ambassador to the EU Gordon Sondland called Trump from Ukraine and the president pressed him on “the investigations.” Following the call, Sondland told a Taylor staffer that Trump “cares more about the investigations of Biden” than Ukraine.“Well, as somebody who has covered a lot of trials, and I know Judge [Kenneth] Starr has probably been on a lot more than I have, when you listen to direct examination and the prosecutor for—is talking to the plaintiff and the plaintiff is getting a chance to tell his story, it usually is pretty devastating,” Wallace said during Fox News’ hearing coverage. “And then when you get cross-examination by the defense attorney, sometimes it turns out not to be quite as effective.”Noting that observers had yet to hear from the Republicans or their minority counsel, Wallace emphasized how compelling Taylor’s testimony was. “Having said that, I think that William Taylor was a very impressive witness and was very damaging to the president,” the anchor declared.Wallace further said that it helped that Taylor had kept copious notes throughout and that he “has a voice like Edward R. Murrow,” adding that the ambassador was a “pretty impressive presence” and “very nonpolitical.”Starr, who was also on the panel, agreed with Wallace that Taylor was impressive but claimed that all of his testimony was “hearsay” and wouldn’t be admissible in a court of law. After Starr noted that military aid to Ukraine was eventually released on Sept. 11, suggesting that this meant there was no quid pro quo tied to Ukrainian investigations, Wallace offered a counterpoint.“Can I just say as a point? It was released two days after the whistleblower complaint went to the Intelligence Committee,” the Fox News Sunday host retorted.Read more at The Daily Beast.Got a tip? Send it to The Daily Beast hereGet our top stories in your inbox every day. Sign up now!Daily Beast Membership: Beast Inside goes deeper on the stories that matter to you. Learn more.

• 
  Diplomat reveals new details at impeachment hearing — read his statement
  CBS News
• 
  Televised impeachment hearings begin today
  ABC News Videos

‘Going to be a long flight’: Plane passenger’s rude act goes viral

A female plane passenger took to Reddit this week to share a horrifying photo of a stranger performing a rude act during her flight. 

N.Y. Mom Tells Dr. Phil About Moment Husband Told Her He Left Twins in Hot Car by Accident

NYC Mom Whose Infant Twins Died in Hot Car Speaks to Dr. Phil

Hayden Panettiere's Baby Daddy Wladimir Klitschko Doesn’t Approve Of Her New Boyfriend Brian Hickerson

He is NOT pleased.

'Treated as a criminal': Walmart receipt and bag checks anger customers. Your rights explained

An apparent step-up of receipt and shopping bag checks at Walmart has sparked customer complaints, raising concerns about shoppers' rights."It was not a request, it was a demand," said Penny Rintoul of Vaughan, Ont., about a recent receipt check just before she exited Walmart with her purchases. She said her local Walmart increased its checks in the spring."It's very angering and demeaning." The Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) said it's investigating the practice of retailers doing routine security checks at the exit, concerned that the way they're conducted may jeopardize customers' rights. Michael Bryant, CCLA's executive director and general counsel, said retailers should get consent before checking receipts or bags. And if no consent is provided, he said, customers are under no obligation to comply. "Their right is to say, 'Thanks, but no thanks,' and walk away," said Bryant."Some people feel strongly about their privacy and, in fact, the way our laws work, that privacy and liberty is protected."In a 2016 ruling on a case involving a suspected shoplifter, an Ontario Superior Court judge wrote that a retailer can detain a suspect if there are reasonable grounds, but — even then — it would have to get consent to do a search. Walmart didn't directly address questions from CBC News about customers' rights including what happens if shoppers refuse receipt checks. The retail giant also didn't say if it has stepped up its security checks."To assist in our efforts to manage costs and offer everyday low prices, customers may be asked to show their receipts as they exit our store to ensure the checkout process went smoothly," said Walmart Canada spokesperson Adam Grachnik in an email.CBC News interviewed several customers who said they weren't "asked," and instead felt pressured to comply.Paula Fletcher of Renfrew County, Ont., said that in August, a Walmart employee watched as she scanned her groceries at self-checkout, and then insisted on inspecting her receipt and shopping bag. "She did not make it an option," said Fletcher. "I don't like being treated as a criminal," she said. "If they don't trust us, they shouldn't have self-checkout." Walmart's recent addition of self-checkout machines appears to be a driving force behind receipt checks. In response to customer complaints on social media, the retailer has replied repeatedly that it's doing the checks to ensure the self-checkout process "went smoothly" and that all items have been scanned. Studies suggest that stores adding self-checkouts can experience more theft because thieves believe the risk of getting caught not scanning items is low.Amy Fraser of Sydney Mines, N.S., said she has experienced frequent receipt and occasional shopping bag inspections in the past five months at Walmart, both after using self-checkout and checking out with a cashier. She said she reached her limit last month when a Walmart employee demanded to check her receipt, just as she prepared to feed her baby before exiting. "He's like pouncing, 'You have your receipt?'" said Fraser. "I just [felt] like walking out and being like, 'No, no, call the cops on me.'"So what happens if a retailer calls the cops? Toronto security consultant James Reese said a retailer needs to have evidence of theft for police to take action. "If they did not see you take something, they cannot come after you just for refusing to show your bags or receipt," he said. In the 2016 case involving the suspected shoplifter, the judge also wrote that "if a store owner is mistaken and no theft has occurred, their detention of a customer makes them liable for … false imprisonment."However, shoppers rejecting receipt checks do risk being banned from the store, said Reese."That's within the merchant's prerogative."What about Costco?Retail giant Costco also checks customers' receipts. However, Costco customers are required to sign up for a membership, which means they may have provided consent — depending on how clearly the rules are laid out, said CCLA's Bryant."They need to tell people about it."Costco didn't reply to requests for comment, but CBC News found its policy on its website in the "membership conditions" section. It says customers are required to show receipts to ensure that "you have been properly charged for your purchases" and to maintain accurate inventory control.At Walmart, there's no membership requirement and customers interviewed said they saw no in-store warnings that they'd be checked. Last week, CBC News did discover signs at several Toronto-area Walmarts which stated, "Please have Receipt ready for Proof of Purchase." But a Toronto criminal lawyer argues that's not good enough. "Just because there's a sign doesn't mean that someone's read it or understood it," said Anthony Moustacalis."Consent does need to be fully informed," he said. "That generally means that you need to know that you have a right to refuse."There's no question that shoplifting is a problem for retailers, especially when it comes to self-checkout. But retailers still need to play by the rules, even when tackling emerging technologies, said Bryant. "New technology should never mean giving up your rights."